SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 75613

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
M. Sanja Goud – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No. 16462 OF 2022

ORDER:

Heard Sri G.Ravi Mohan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Finance and Planning appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Sri Sapavat Sreenivas, learned Standing Counsel for SC Co-operative Society Limited appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 4.

2. The petitioner approached this Court seeking the prayer as under:

“...to issue an order or orders, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the action of the Respondent in not adding yearly increments and H.R.A to the petitioners minimum time scale pay as the same is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the Respondents to grant yearly annual grade increments and H.R.A to the petitioner along with minimum time scale with effect from 2019 as per the orders passed in W.P.No.26788 of 2017 reported in 2017 (6) ALD 638 and to pass...”

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that petitioner was appointed as an NMR (Attendant/Driver) in 1992 with the 4th respondent society. Despite G.O.Ms.No.193 (1990) and G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 24.12.1994, issued by the Gov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top