I N THE HI GH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WRI T PETI TI ON No.15577 OF 2023 Between:

Aakutota Urmila & others … Petitioners And The State of Telangana & others … Respondents JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 11.07.2025 THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers : Yes may be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be : Yes marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to : Yes see the fair copy of the Judgment?

___________________________ MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA I N THE HI GH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WRI T PETI TI ON No.15577 OF 2023 % 11.07.2025 Between:

# Aakutota Urmila & others … Petitioners And $ The State of Telangana & others … Respondents < Gist:

> Head Note:

! Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri Sridhar Lonkala ^ Counsel for the Respondents : Ld. Asst. G.P. for Medical Health and Family Welfare Ld. Deputy Solicitor General of I ndia. ? Cases Referred:

(1) 2024 LawSuit (SC) 1209 (2) 2025 INSC 144 (3) CA No.8558 of 2018, SCC HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.15577 OF 2023

ORDER:

Heard Sri Sridhar Lonkala, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical Health and Family Welfare, Standing Counsel for NI MS and Deputy Solicitor General of I ndia appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“…issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the rejection orders dated 15/09/2021 in Rc.No.HR6/235/2011/NSCK passed by the Respondent No.2 not regularising the services of the petitioners herein on par with the similar class IV employees vide R.C.No.6/2/DW/92/03 dated 30/08/2003 orders, vide G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22/04/1994, Finance and Planning (FW.PC.III) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India besides the Law declared by the Supreme Court of India in Secretary, State of Karnataka and others v. Umadevi case mandating periodic regular recruitment to the sanctioned posts and prays to direct the Respondents herein to regularise the petitioners herein forthwith on par with the already regularised similar daily wage employees vide G.O.Ms.No.212 with all consequential monetary benefits including Minimum Time Scale of Pay by implementing the consent order passed in W.P.No.19225 of 2020 in the interest of justice and pass…”

3. The case of the petitioners in brief as per the averments made in the affidavit filed by the petitioners in support of the present Writ Petition is as under:-

The petitioners herein are the daily wage employees of Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS), Hyderabad, and are in service since three decades. The petitioners earlier filed W.P.No.16260 of 2021 questioning the action of the respondents in not regularizing their services on par with the similar class IV employees vide orders R.C.No.6/2/DW/92/03 dated 30.08.2003 according to G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994 Finance and Planning (FW.PC.III) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh. This Court disposed of W.P.No.16260 of 2021 with a direction to the petitioners to submit fresh representation to respondents and on submitting such representation the respondents were directed to consider the same in accordance with law in the light of the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi. Accordingly, the petitioners submitted representations on 30.08.2021 to respondent No.2, and same were rejected by respondent No.2 vide impugned proceedings dated 15.09.2023. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred the present writ petition.

4. PERUSED THE RECORD:-

(A) The relevant portion of the impugned Proceedings vide HR6/ 235/ 2011/ NSCK, dated 15.09.2021 issued by the respondent No.2 to one of the petitioners is extracted hereunder:-

The Writ petition filed by the ind