SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 75959

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
Smt. Gunduboina Venkata Pushpalatha – Appellant
Versus
Gunduboina Vamsee Krishna – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY C.R.P.No.1349 OF 2025

ORDER

Heard Mr. M.S.N. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S. Prabhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent and perused the record.

2. The instant civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 07.03.2025 passed in I.A.No.1237 of 2024 in F.C.OP.No.940 of 2023 by the learned Family Court, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar (for short, ‘trial Court’).

3. Vide the impugned order dated 07.03.2025, the trial Court has rejected the petition filed by the petitioner-wife under Order IX Rule 13 of CPC seeking to condone the delay of 274 days in filing the petition to set aside the ex parte order and decree dated

30.10.2023 passed in F.C.O.P.No.940 of 2023 was filed.

4. The facts in a nutshell are that the FCOP was filed by the respondent-husband seeking for a decree of divorce under the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The FCOP was filed in July, 2023. Notice was issued to the petitioner-wife and as there was no representation from her, she was proceeded ex parte.

5. Thus, from the factual matrix itself, it could be evident that the trial Court de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top