SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 75996

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
V. Chandrakanth Goud – Appellant
Versus
Badani Soujanya – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2864 of 2024

ORDER

The present Civil Revision Petition is preferred against the order dated 29.08.2024 in I.A. No. 45 of 2024 in F.C.O.P. No. 67 of 2023 passed by the Family Court-cum- III Additional Sessions Judge at Nalgonda.

2. The revision petitioner herein is the petitioner in the main petition.

3. The petitioner herein filed the subject petition as petitioner for dissolution of marriage vide F.C.O.P. No. 67 of 2023 (Old No.1288 of 2019) under Section 13(1)(i) and (ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

4. The petitioner herein had filed the underlying interlocutory application vide I.A. No. 45 of 2024 in F.C.O.P. No. 67 of 2023 under Order I Rule 10 r/w section 151 of Civil procedure Code (for short ‘CPC’) seeking permission to implead proposed respondent No.2 as respondent in the above petition. The said application is filed on the ground that he is necessary and proper party to the main petition for effective adjudication of matter.

5. The trial Court dismissed the underlying interlocutory application holding that the proposed respondent need not be impleaded in above suit. The trial court observed that the allegation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top