SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 75999

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Espi Emmanuel – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.34297 of 2023

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for MA & UD appearing for respondent No.1, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent No.2, and Sri M.Ram Mohan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3 and perused the record.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage and the lis involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent Nos.5 to 7 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.

3. The petitioner by the present Writ Petition has assailed the action of the 3rd respondent in considering the building permission application submitted by the 5th respondent herein and issuing letter of approval for commencement of work, vide letter No.313346/BHEE/ 0069/2023 dt.03.11.2023, as being illegal, arbitrary and ignoring the orders of this Court dt.12.06.2023 in W.P.No.14491 of 2023.

4. Briefly stated, the case of the petitioner is that he is the owner and possessor of land to an extent of Ac.0.22 guntas in Sy.No.1097/1/1/7/1 located on the northern side of the land forming

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top