IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
The APSRTC – Appellant
Versus
Madire Ramulu – Respondent
MACMA 2305/2019
##PAGE1##
1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
M.A.C.M.A.Nos.2305 and 2954 of 2019
DATE: 28.01.2026
M.A.C.M.A. No.2305 of 2019:
Between:
The APSRTC,
Musheerabad, Hyderabad,
Rep. by its General Manager
(presently at Pandit Nehru Bus station,
Vijayawada, Krishna District)
…..Appellant
AND
Madire Ramulu and another
….Respondents
M.A.C.M.A.No.2954 of 2019
Between:
Madire Ramulu and another
…..Appellants
AND
The APSRTC,
Musheerabad, Hyderabad,
Rep. by its General Manager
(presently at Pandit Nehru Bus station,
Vijayawada, Krishna District) and another
….Respondents
COMMON JUDGMENT
M.A.C.M.A.No.2305 of 2019 is filed by the APSRTC, under
Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment
and decree dated 30-11-2018 passed by the Chairman, Motor
##PAGE2##2
Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge at Nalgonda
(hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”) in M.V.O.P.No.679 of 2016,
whereby the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.2,58,400/-
together with interest @ 7% per annum from the date of filing of
petition till the date of the ward with subsequent interest @ 6% per
annum from the date of award till the date of realization in favour of
the claimant, Madire Ramulu, for the injuries sustained by him in a
road accident, whereas the claimant filed M.A.C.M.A.No.2954 of 2019
seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.
.
2 For the sake of convenience, the parties will hereinafter be
referred to as arrayed before the Tribunal.
3. The brief facts of the case are that on 11-07-2016, at about 9:00
a.m., the claimant was riding a TVS Jupiter moped bearing
No.TS-05-EM-1068 from Pylon Colony towards Nellikal Primary
School and when he reached the outskirts of Hill Colony, near
Vinayaka Temple in Nalgonda District, an APSRTC bus bearing No.AP-
29-Z-1501 coming from Hyderabad side towards Macherla side,
collided with the motor cycle, due to which the claimant sustained
multiple grievous injuries. The claimant was initially taken to
Government Hospital, Nagarjunasagar, and subsequently referred to
Max Cure Hospitals, Madapur, Hyderabad, where he was treated as
an in-patient from 11.07.2016 to 18.07.2016. Stating that the
##PAGE3##3
claimant incurred substantial medical expenses during treatment, he
filed the aforesaid claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- against
the APSRTC (the owner of the bus) and the driver of the APSRTC bus
i.e., respondent Nos.1 and 2 respectively.
4. Before the Tribunal, respondent No.2 remained ex parte.
Respondent No.1-APSRTC, while contesting the petition, denied
negligence on the part of the bus driver and alleged that the claimant
himself drove into the bus in a rash manner. The APSRTC not only
challenged the maintainability of the petition but also raised issues of
contributory negligence and non-joinder of necessary parties and
sought for dismissal of the petition.
5. The Tribunal, on appreciation of oral and documentary
evidence, found negligence on the part of the driver of the bus and
awarded Rs.2,58,400/- with interest @ 7% per annum from the date
of filing the claim to the date of award and @ 6% per annum
thereafter. While the APSRTC preferred MACMA.No.2305 of 2019
challenging liability and quantum, the claimant filed MACMA.No.2954
of 2019 seeking enhancement of compensation.
6. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the APSRTC contended
that the Tribunal erred in holding that the accident occurred due to
rash and negligent driving of the bus driver; that there was no
##PAGE4##4
negligence on the part of the bus; that the accident was caused due to
the rash and negligent driving by the claimant riding the motorcycle;
and that the Tribunal failed to consider that the owner and insurer of
the motorcycle were not made parties, resulting in non-joinder of
necessary parties. Learned Standing Counsel further contended that
the Tribunal erred in awarding various heads of compensation
including medical expenses, transp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.