SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2493

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
M Srinivas Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 21747/2020



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDEABAD Between M. Srinivas Reddy and another …Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others …Respondents

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed seeking following relief:

“To declare the action of the 3rd respondent in receiving the regularization applications of the 4th and 5th respondents vide ROS 022002786020 and ROS 022002784661 as submitted for seeking regularization of the alleged private sale deed in respect of agriculture land in Sy. No. 174, 175 and 176, admeasuring Ac.18-18 guntas at Konapur village, Kodimail Mandal, Jagitiyal District, though the 3rd respondent is inherent lack of jurisdiction to receive such application and further though the suit for declaration of the respondents 4 and 5 filed in O.S. No. 9/2012 in respect of the above land was dismissed by the II Addl. District Judge, Jagitiyal and further though their earlier regularization applications were considered and rejected by the 3rd respondent in file No. B/2807/2013, dated 22/12/2018, as illegal, arbitrary and for consequential relief.”

petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue Nos.4 and 5.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners represented that the petitioners have filed another writ petition vide W.P.No.17767 of 2025 for direction to revenue authorities not to proceed with the regularization application submitted by respondent Nos.5 and 6 therein/respondent Nos.4 and 5 herein, and this Court vide order dated 25.06.2025, directed respondent Nos.2 to 4 therein, i.e., revenue authorities, not to entertain any registration of the documents for regularization of the subject land in favour of respondent Nos.5 and 6 therein/respondent Nos.4 and 5 herein or any third parties, except in accordance with law.

4. In view of interim orders in W.P.No.17767 of 2025, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismissed.

___________________________________

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top