SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2778

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Thoutam Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Between:

Thoutam Satyanarayana and another ...Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad and another ...Respondents

ORDER

When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that he has given no objection on behalf of the petitioners. However, since the charge sheet has been filed and the same has been numbered as C.C.No.2619 of 2024, the present criminal petition filed for quashing the F.I.R. has become infructuous.

Recording the above submission, this criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous, granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet, if aggrieved.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________________

Lk lk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top