IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
M/s. Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy (SLNS) Diagnostic Centre – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 35986/2025
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF
TELANGANA
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No. 35986 OF 2025
30.01.2026
Between:
M/s Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy (SLNS)
Diagnostic Centre
Rep. by its Managing Director Dr. D. Pandu Goud
@ Pandu
….. Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Department of Medical & Health
& others
….. Respondents
O R D E R:
Petitioner Diagnostic centre was being run by its
Managing Director Dr. D. Pandu Goud who possessed MBBS
and M.D Radiology Course and registered himself with
Telangana State Medical Counsel and the same was renewed
from time to time, valid up to 20.11.2027. It is stated,
unfortunately, T. Srilatha and D. Sujatha underwent abortion at
Gayatri Hospital at Bhongiri on 07.07.2025 and he has nothing
to do with the same and there was no request for sex
determination by them; except Srilatha, the other person is not
##PAGE2##2
known to him and she did not undergo scanning with him,
however, police erroneously registered FIR No. 266 of 2025 on
07.07.2025 under various offences and he obtained bail and
gave sufficient sureties to lift the seizure of Diagnostic Centre.
1.1. While so, it is stated, the 3rd respondent gave show
cause notice to petitioner on 08.07.2025 based on registration
of FIR, alleged complaint of Circle Inspector and proceedings of
the 4th respondent dated 03.07.2025 and also the enquiry
report dated 08.07.2025. According to petitioner, even as per
the enquiry report, there is no material to come to the
conclusion against petitioner. Petitioner is stated to have
submitted detailed explanation on 14.07.2025, however, the 3rd
respondent without passing final orders, subsequently, on
10.09.2025, issued show cause notice. Petitioner is stated to
have filed explanation on 16.09.2025, but the 3rd respondent
without considering the same, issued the impugned order dated
07.11.2025 whereby petitioner’s licence to run the diagnostic
centre was cancelled.
2. The 3rd respondent filed counter stating that
Prudhviraj Gyapaka filed Writ Petition No. 31457 of 2025
questioning the inaction of this respondent against petitioner
based on the complaint received from the Inspector of Bhongir,
##PAGE3##3
dated 07.07.2025; enquiry was conducted and report was given
on 08.07.2025 and that they issued show cause notice on
08.07.2025 to petitioner to give explanation in 7 days; petitioner
submitted explanation on 14.07.2025 which was found
unsatisfactory. It is also stated, several complaints were made
by public against petitioner, hence, inspection was conducted
on 20.08.2025; the Collector and District Magistrate being the
Appropriate Authority issued notice to petitioner under Section
20 (1) of Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques
Act, 1994 on 09.09.2025 and petitioner gave explanation on
16.09.2025; the same was placed before the District Level
Advisory Committee which examined the explanation and found
the same not satisfactory, hence, they recommended to the
District Level Appropriate Authority Committee under the
Chairmanship of the 3rd respondent to take necessary action
and the recommendation of District Level Advisory Committee
have been placed before the 3rd respondent which reviewed the
proposals of (DLSE) and passed a resolution and recommended
to cancel the registration by considering the facts and lapses
mentioned the impugned order was passed on 07.11.2025
under Sections 11 and 32 of Clinical Establishments Act and
that petitioner's Diagnostic Centre was registered under
##PAGE4##4
Allopathic Private Medical Care Establishments on 26.09.2023
by DM and HO but not registered under Clinical Establishments
Act. Petitioner also did not mention about cancellation orders
passed on 07.11.2025 in the earlier Writ Petition and
intentionally filed the present Writ Petition.
3. Respondents 5 and 6 were impleaded by order
dated 08.01.2026. They filed counter claiming to be the social
workers in Bhongir Town and District; they came to know that
petitioner diagnostic centre was conducting illeg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.