SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 3018

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
M. Baby Sarojini – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO.12785 OF 2015 DATE: 28.01.2026 Between:

M.Baby Sarojini w/o. late M.Sambasiva Rao, R/o.Flat No.307, Teja Heights, Chandanagar, Hyderabad-23.

…. Petitioner and The State of Telangana, Municipal Administration Department, rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others.

…. Respondents

ORDER:

Heard Ms. T.Padmaja, learned counsel representing Mr.V.Y.Prabhuvu, learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. T.Kanya Kumari, learned counsel representing Mr. G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

2. The present writ petition has been filed declaring the action of respondent No.2 in constructing the compound wall closing the petitioner’s Plot Nos.17 and 18 on the Eastern side to a length of 36 ft + 36 ft each plot, totaling 72 ft. as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to remove such compound wall to get access

30 ft. road to their plot Nos.17 and 18.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner submits that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top