SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 3550

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Ajay Rajendra Wadiyar – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Laxmidas Patel – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3945 of 2025 DATE: 20.01.2026 Between:

Ajay Rajendra Wadiyar.

...Petitioner AND Praveen Laxmidas Patel and four others.

….Respondents

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff challenging the docket order dated 15.10.2025 passed in I.A.No.354 of 2025 in O.S.No.17 of 2019 by the learned V Additional District Judge at Bodhan, whereby and whereunder, the trial Court allowed the said I.A filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 4 herein/defendant Nos.1 to 4 seeking appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to record the evidence of respondent No.1 as DW1.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff strenuously argued that the trial Court passed the impugned order in a mechanical manner on the very day the application was filed. It is contended that while the counsel for the petitioner before the trial Court received a copy of the petition and endorsed a request for time to file a counter, the trial Court allowed the petition without affording any opportunity to contest the matter. It is f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top