I N THE HI GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE N.TUKARAMJI WRI T PETI TI ON No.13375 OF 2019 DATE :20.01.2026 Between:

Sri Bajinki Srinivas.

…Petitioner AND The State of Telangana and others.

…Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief:

“…to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent i.e., Station House Officer, Bachupally Police Station, Cyberabad, in registering multiple FIRs against the petitioners basing alleged single occurance vide Crime No. 652 of 2018, dated 28-12-2018, Crime No. 653 of 2018, dated 29-12-2018, Crime No. 655 of 2018, dated 30-12-2018, and Crime No. 3 of 2019, dated 02-01-2019, as illegal, in violation of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent herein to club all the FIRs into one i.e., FIRs against the petitioners basing alleged single occurance vide Crime No. 652 of 2018, dated 28-12-2018, Crime No. 653 of 2018, dated 29-12-2018, Crime No. 655 of 2018, dated 30-12-2018, and Crime No. 3 of 2019, dated 02-01-2019, by treating the other FIRs as statements and to pass...”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, being aggrieved by the registration of multiple crimes against the petitioner and seeking appropriate directions to club the FIRs, the present writ petition has been filed seeking suitable relief.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that the crimes referred to in the petition, namely Crime Nos. 652, 653, and 655 of 2018, and Crime No. 3 of 2019, were duly investigated, and upon completion of investigation, charge sheets were filed. The said cases were taken on file as C.C. No. 5478 of 2019, C.C. No. 4970 of 2019, C.C. No. 743 of 2020, and C.C. No. 5237 of 2019 on the file of the IX Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kukatpally. He further submits that, during the pendency of the proceedings, the disputes between the parties were amicably settled before the Lok Adalat, and the offences were formally compounded by orders of the competent Court on 11.09.2025, 10.09.2025, and 11.11.2025, as the case may be. In view of these developments, he submits that nothing further survives for consideration in this matter and prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

5. I have perused the material available on record.

6. Having regard to the prayer of the petitioner and the subsequent developments that occurred during the pendency of this writ petition, particularly the amicable settlement of disputes between the parties before the Lok Adalat and the compounding of the offences, it is evident that the grievance of the petitioner no longer survives. In effect, nothing further remains for adjudication in this matter.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

______________

N.TUKARAMJI , J Date: 20.01.2026 hk

5223 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE N.TUKARAMJI WRI T PETI TI ON No.13375 OF 2019 Dated:20.01.2026 hk