SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 3603

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
Mumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf and another – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and two others – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE N.TUKARAMJI WRI T PETI TI ON No.13124 OF 2019 DATE:20.01.2026 Between:

Mumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf and another ……Petitioners AND The State of Telangana & Others …Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief: “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate order or direction in the nature of a Writ declaring the action of the third respondent in not taking action after registering Crime No.658/2018 of P.S.Saifabad, Hyderabad as arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India and abdication of statutory powers under Code of Criminal Procedure, and other applicable laws and consequently direct the third respondent to forthwith investigate into Crime No. 658/2018 of P.S.Saifabad, Hyderabad and take further action as expeditiously as possible preferably within a month in the interest of justice and pass such other order or further orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and pass......”

2. Heard learned counsel representing Sri B.Nalin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top