I N THE HI GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE N.TUKARAMJI WRI T PETI TI ON No.13124 OF 2019 DATE:20.01.2026 Between:

Mumtaz Yarud Dowla Wakf and another ……Petitioners AND The State of Telangana & Others …Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief: “…to issue a Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate order or direction in the nature of a Writ declaring the action of the third respondent in not taking action after registering Crime No.658/2018 of P.S.Saifabad, Hyderabad as arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India and abdication of statutory powers under Code of Criminal Procedure, and other applicable laws and consequently direct the third respondent to forthwith investigate into Crime No. 658/2018 of P.S.Saifabad, Hyderabad and take further action as expeditiously as possible preferably within a month in the interest of justice and pass such other order or further orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and pass......”

2. Heard learned counsel representing Sri B.Nalin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sridhar Bhuvanagiri, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, as respondent No. 3 failed to take appropriate action after registration of Crime No. 658 of 2018 of Saifabad Police Station, the present writ petition has been filed seeking suitable directions.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that the said crime has been duly investigated, and a final report classifying the case as “lack of evidence” was filed on 13.12.2019 before the Court of the First Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. Hence, nothing further remains for consideration in this matter, and he prays for dismissal of the writ petition.

5. I have perused the material available on record.

6. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent police authorities failed to conduct a proper investigation in Crime No. 658 of 2018. However, as reported by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the investigation has already been completed, and a final report has been filed before the learned Magistrate citing lack of evidence. In view of this factual position, it is evident that the grievance of the petitioners has been duly addressed.

7. Nevertheless, reserving the right of the petitioners to avail appropriate remedies before the learned Magistrate concerned, in accordance with law, if they are so advised, this writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

______________

N.TUKARAMJI , J Date: 20.01.2026 hk

5247 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE N.TUKARAMJI WRI T PETI TI ON No.13124 OF 2019 Dated: 20.01.2026 hk