IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD DATE: 19.01.2026 Between:

A.Anjaneyulu …Petitioner AND The State of Telangana Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Home Department and 10 others …Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief:

“…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 1 to 3, in not taking any action basing on complaint filed by the petitioner dated. 10-8-2019, and its enclosures, photographs and CD against the respondents No. 4 to 11, illegal and High-handed action of dispossessing the petitioner and his family members from agricultural lands Ac.0.05 ¼ gts, in Sy.No.600/ అ/1/2, Ac.0.28 gts in Sy.No.602/ఈ/3/2, Ac. 0.30 gts in Sy.No. 602/ఈ/2, Ac.0.05¼ gts, in Sy.No. 600/అ /1/4, Ac.0.05 ¼ gts in Sy.No. 600/అ /1/3, Ac. 0.28 gts in Sy.No. 602/ఈ /4/2, totalling to Ac. 2.21 ¾ gts, in Koltur Village of Shamirpet Mandal, on 8-8-2019, by removing the 200 stone pillars and damaging the same and entire crop sowed in the said land, on 8-8-2019, is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. Consequently direct the respondents No. 1 to 3, to take necessary stringent action against the respondents No.4 to 11, basing on a complaint filed by the petitioner dated. 10-8-2019, and its enclosures i.e.,the photographs and CD, thereby restore the possession of the agricultural lands Ac.0.05 ¼ gts, in

3/4 gts, in Koltur Village of Shamirpet Mandal, to the petitioner immediately

and to provide appropriate police protection to the person and property of the

petitioner...”

2. Heard Ms. Isha Mehra, learned counsel representing Mr.K.Venumadhav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause of action in the present writ petition no longer survives for adjudication and, therefore, seeks dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous.

4. Recording the submissions of both learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________________