IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.704 of 2026 DATE OF ORDER: 19.01.2026 Between:

Mogapatti Greeshma, W/o.K.V.L.N.S.Kumar.

...Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department

5^th Floor, A Block, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana – 500 003, Phone: 040-23452143, E-mail: prl_home@telangana.gov.in ...Respondents

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondent No.4 in calling the petitioner to police station without informing the reason or issuing any notice. A consequential prayer is sought to direct respondent No.4 not to harass the petitioner to come to police station.

instructions of Sub-Inspector of Police, Sanath Nagar, Police Station, would submit that one P.Kishore Babu lodged a complaint against the petitioner with respondent No.4 – S.H.O., Sanath Nagar Police Station, Hyderabad on 09.12.2025 stating that the petitioner cheated him in the name of providing job and had taken money.

3. Based on the said complaint, the respondent No.4 made G.D. entry on the same day. During the course of inquiry, the respondent No.4 called the complainant and petitioner over mobile on 24.12.2025 and asked them to appear before respondent No.4. Accordingly the petitioner and complaint appeared before respondent No.4. On inquiry, it is revealed that there is a civil dispute between the petitioner and complaint. After completion of inquiry, the respondent No.4 suggested the complainant to approach the Competent Court for redressal and the said complaint was closed by respondent No.4 as “civil in nature” on 26.12.2025 and the same was informed to the complainant. It is further submitted that the respondent No.4 has only called the petitioner for enquiry and did not harass the petitioner and interfered with the civil disputes.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned 5. Recording the submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the respondent No.4 is directed to follow due procedure as contemplated under law before initiating any action on the petitioner and the petitioner may pursue her remedy as available under law.

6. With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending, in this petition, shall stand closed.

_________________________________ JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Date: 19.01.2026 Nsk