SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 3967

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
Bomma Vineela – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK Dated 9th January, 2026.

Between:

Bomma Vineela … Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of General Administration (Ser.A), Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Secretariat, Hyderabad, and three others.

… Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

“…to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent No.1 to 4 in not considering the petitioner representations dt. 16-04-2024, 29-11-2024 and 28-01-2025 submitted to appoint her in any other post which is equivalent to the Jr. Asst. cum Typist (presently which petitioner discharging) or any other post as per petitioner’s qualification or the lower post to present post as per the Circular Memo No.60681/Ser.A/2003-1 dt.12-08-2003 and also in not considering the recommendations of the respondent No.2 vide his letter No.A2/15/2016, dt.06-01-2025 by the respondent No.4 for appointing her as Jr. Assistant or any other posts which petitioner is entitled, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top