IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA,THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR
Nallamalla Kameshwari – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.229 OF 2026 DATE OF ORDER: 07.01.2026 Between:
Nallamalla Kameshwari …..Petitioner AND The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Central Secretariat, Shastry Bhavan, New Delhi and Three Others …..Respondents Mr. V.Venkata Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
Mr. N.Bhujanga Rao, Deputy Solicitor General of India, appearing for the respondent No.1.
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)
1. The Writ Petition has been filed against a Possession Notice dated 29.11.2025 issued by the respondent No.2.
2. The sole contention of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the impugned Possession Notice was issued without a notice under section 13(2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (‘SARFAESI Act’).
3. The contention is misconceived since Appendix IV of The Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 clearly states that the said Notice in the Form given in Appendix IV can only be issued subsequent to Notice
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.