SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 4124

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Banda Komuramma – Appellant
Versus
Gandla Venkanna – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY Dated:05.01.2026 Between:

Banda Komuramma …Petitioner And Gandla Venkanna and another.

…Respondents

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order, dated

25.09.2025, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Peddapalli in I.A.No.361 of 2025, whereunder and whereby the application filed by petitioner under Section 5 of Limitation Act seeking to condone the delay of 99 days in filing the application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to set aside the ex parte decree, dated 12.02.2025, was dismissed.

2. Heard Sri V.Ramchander Rao, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri Y.Ashok Raj, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

3. The revision petitioner is defendant No.1, respondent No.1 is the plaintiff and respondent No.2 herein is defendant No.2 in the suit.

4. For convenience, hereinafter the parties will be referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.

5. The brief factual matrix of the case is that the plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit for specific performance of agreement of sale deed, dated 15.08.2020, executed by defendant No.1 in favour of the plaintiff for sale consideration of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top