##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

DATE: 23.12.2025

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.949 OF 2020

Between:

Mohd.Ghouse and others. …Petitioners

And

Sri K.Narender and others. …Respondents

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners-defendants

aggrieved by the docket order, dated 16.03.2020, in

I.A.No.582 of 2020 in O.S.No.1272 of 2018 passed by the

learned XV Additional District Judge-cum-II Additional Family

Judge, Ranga Reddy District, Kukatpally, whereunder and

whereby application filed under Order VII Rule 14 read with

Section 151 of C.P.C to receive the enlisted documents

against the respondents-defendants, was allowed subject to

proof of and relevancy of the documents.

Page 2 of 7

NNR,J

crp_949_2020

2. Heard Sri K.Venumadhav, learned counsel for the

petitioners, Sri V.Raghunath, learned counsel for respondent

Nos.2 to 5, 7 to 21 and Sri L.Aravind Reddy, learned counsel

for respondent No.6. Perused the record.

3. Brief facts of the case are that respondent Nos.1 to

3 and 5 herein had filed a suit in O.S.No.1272 of 2018 on the

file of learned XV Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy

District, Kukatpally, seeking to declare that the decree and

judgment, dated 13.10.2016 passed in O.S.No.1258 of 2008

on the file of learned XIV Additional District Judge, Ranga

Reddy District, as null and void and not binding on them and

also for perpetual injunction against the petitioners herein

and respondent Nos.17 to 21.

4. The revision petitioners are the defendants before

the trial Court. It is stated that during the pendency of the

suit, the respondents-plaintiffs filed the aforesaid

interlocutory application seeking permission to receive the

documents enlisted along with the petition. The said

application was allowed by the learned trial Court. Aggrieved

by the same, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed

Page 3 of 7

NNR,J

crp_949_2020

by the petitioners-defendants. It is stated that in the entire

plaint, the plaintiffs have not mentioned the documents

referred to in I.A. No.582 of 2020, nor have they pleaded

about the said documents in any manner whatsoever. It is

contended that respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5, along with

respondent Nos.4 and 6 to 16, without filing any impleadment

petition and despite not being parties to the suit, surprisingly

filed an application under Order VII Rule 14 read with Section

151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking to receive the said

documents. The learned trial Court, without proper

consideration, allowed the said application.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners contended

that the learned trial Court ought not to have allowed the

application, as the parties sought to be arrayed as petitioners

are complete strangers to the suit and have no connection

whatsoever with the subject matter thereof. It was further

contended that the said documents cannot be taken on record

in the absence of any corresponding pleadings in the plaint

and hence, he prays to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition.

Page 4 of 7

NNR,J

crp_949_2020

6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the

respondents-plaintiffs contended that the said documents are

relevant for the purpose to prove that there was fraud

committed by the petitioners-defendants for making

subsequent sales. He also further argued that as the present

suit is filed for cancellation of judgment and decree on the

ground of fraud. To establish that the fraud committed by the

defendants therein, the said documents are necessary.

Therefore, the learned trial Court after considering the entire

evidence on record rightly allowed the application and there

are no grounds to interfere with the impugned order and

hence, he prays to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition.

7. As seen from the record, the respondents–

plaintiffs contended that since the said documents were

obtained recently, they could not be produced earlier. Except

stating that some of the documents coul