SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 76273

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Gaddam Sai Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 20399/2023



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

WRIT PETITION No.20399 of 2023

DATE OF ORDER: 22.12.2025

Between:

Gaddam Sai Reddy

...Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana,

rep. by its Principal Secretary,

Revenue Department,

Secretariat Buildings, and others

...Respondents

ORDER :

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

“…to issue a Writ or direction more particularly one

in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of

the respondent No.2 and 3 in not mutating the petitioners

name in all the revenue records and issuing the pattedar

pass book in respect of the land in Sy.No.312/AA/2 to an

extent of Ac.3-00gts and Sy.No.312/A/1 to an extent of

##PAGE2##

Page 2 of 5

Ac.0-30gts situated at Kondapuram Village, Khammam

Rural Mandal, Khammam District as illegal, arbitrary,

contrary to the provisions of the Rights in Land and

Pattadar Pass Book Act, 2020, violation of principles of

natural justice besides violation of Article 12, 14 and 300-

A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the

2nd and 3rd respondents to mutate the name of the

petitioner in all the revenue records and issue pattedar

pass book and title deed duly updating in the Dharani

Portal in respect of the above land by considering the

applications made on 05-10-2017 and 30-04-2019

through meeseva and pass..…”

2. Heard Sri Srikanth, learned counsel representing

Sri Pulimamidi Shashidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the

petitioner and L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government

Pleader for Revenue, for the respondents and perused the

record.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would

submit that the petitioner herein is the absolute owner and

possessor of land to an extent of Acs.3.00 guntas in

Sy.No.312/AA/2 and Ac.0.30 guntas in Sy.No.312/A/1,

situated at Kondapuram Village, Khammam Rural Mandal,

Khammam District, having acquired the same by way of

purchase through registered sale deed bearing document

##PAGE3##

Page 3 of 5

No.1044/2006, dated 15.05.2006 executed by Mr.Shasanala

Lakshmaiah and document No.1147/2006, dated

24.05.2006 executed by document No.1147/2006, dated

24.05.2006 executed by Shasanala Venkata Narsamma

registered at SRO Kusumanchi. Since the date of purchase,

the petitioner is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the

subject property.

4. Soon after the purchase of the said property, the

petitioner made an application before the respondent-

authorities to mutate his name in the revenue records and to

issue pattedar passbook and title deed in his favour. But

the respondent-authorities did not do so. The petitioner

made another application under Form 6(A) to respondent

No.3 through Meeseva dated 05.10.2017 vide Application

No.MU02170520957 for mutation of the name of the

petitioner in the revenue records. But the reasons best

known to the Tahsildar, he neither rejected not considered

the application submitted by the petitioner. However, after

lapse of two years the petitioner again submitted an

##PAGE4##

Page 4 of 5

application under Form 6(A) through Meeseva vide

Application No.MU021900598065, dated 30.04.2019. But

till date the respondent-authorities have not acted upon the

said applications, hence, the present writ petition.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue on

instructions would submit that the applications submitted

by the petitioner are under consideration. The respondent-

authorities will consider the same and pass appropriate

orders in accordance with law.

6. In the light of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

the case and upon perusing the material available on record,

this writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent-

authorities to consider the applications submitted by the

petitioner dated 05.10.2017 and 30.04.2019 and pass

appropriate orders, strictly in accordance with law, by

putting the petitioner and all affected parties on notice and

affording them an opportunity of hearing. If, respondent-

authorities are not inclined to accept

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top