IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
V.Sujatha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana Rep by its Principle Secretary – Respondent
WP 12020/2015
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION No.12020 OF 2015
DATE : 30.01.2026
Between:
V.Sujatha
…Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana and Others
…Respondents
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief:
“…Issue a Writ, Order or direction, preferably one in the nature of
Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not
adding section 307 of I.PC against the unofficial respondents in F.IR
No 56/2015 though the complaint clearly discloses the same
offence as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art 14 of the Constitution
of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to add section
307 of I.P.C in F.IR No 56/2015 and investigate the same in
accordance with law along with other offences and pass.......”
2. None for the petitioner.
3. Heard Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader
for Home.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that,
after due investigation in Crime No.56 of 2015 on the file of Medipally
Police Station, a charge sheet was filed, pursuant to which C.C.
##PAGE2##2
No.799 of 2019 was taken on file by the learned Principal Junior Civil
Judge-cum-IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-
Malkajgiri. It is further submitted that, during the pendency of the said
proceedings, the parties amicably settled their disputes before the
Lok Adalat and, in consequence thereof, the offences were
compounded by the competent Court. In view of the said settlement,
it is contended that nothing further survives for consideration in this
matter.
5. I have perused the materials on record.
6. The prayer of the petitioner is that Respondent No.2 failed to
invoke Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No.56 of 2015.
However, the subsequent developments that occurred during the
pendency of this petition clearly demonstrate that the offence has
been compounded against the accused. In that view of the matter,
nothing further remains for deliberation or adjudication.
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_______________
N.TUKARAMJI, J
Date: 30.01.2026
CHS
##PAGE3##3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION No.12020 OF 2015
Dated: 30.01.2026
CHS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.