SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 4228

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
V.Sujatha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana Rep by its Principle Secretary – Respondent
WP 12020/2015



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

WRIT PETITION No.12020 OF 2015

DATE : 30.01.2026

Between:

V.Sujatha

…Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana and Others

…Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief:

“…Issue a Writ, Order or direction, preferably one in the nature of

Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not

adding section 307 of I.PC against the unofficial respondents in F.IR

No 56/2015 though the complaint clearly discloses the same

offence as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art 14 of the Constitution

of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to add section

307 of I.P.C in F.IR No 56/2015 and investigate the same in

accordance with law along with other offences and pass.......”

2. None for the petitioner.

3. Heard Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader

for Home.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that,

after due investigation in Crime No.56 of 2015 on the file of Medipally

Police Station, a charge sheet was filed, pursuant to which C.C.

##PAGE2##

2

No.799 of 2019 was taken on file by the learned Principal Junior Civil

Judge-cum-IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Medchal-

Malkajgiri. It is further submitted that, during the pendency of the said

proceedings, the parties amicably settled their disputes before the

Lok Adalat and, in consequence thereof, the offences were

compounded by the competent Court. In view of the said settlement,

it is contended that nothing further survives for consideration in this

matter.

5. I have perused the materials on record.

6. The prayer of the petitioner is that Respondent No.2 failed to

invoke Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No.56 of 2015.

However, the subsequent developments that occurred during the

pendency of this petition clearly demonstrate that the offence has

been compounded against the accused. In that view of the matter,

nothing further remains for deliberation or adjudication.

7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

_______________

N.TUKARAMJI, J

Date: 30.01.2026

CHS

##PAGE3##

3

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

WRIT PETITION No.12020 OF 2015

Dated: 30.01.2026

CHS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top