IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Madhur Devanathan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLRC 102/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.102 of 2026
DATE: 29.01.2026
Between:
Madhur Devanathan Kumar
…. Revision Petitioner /
Accused No.2
AND
The State of Telangana,
Through the Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State of Telangana.
…. Respondent/Complainant
O R D E R
This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner–
Accused No.2 seeking to set aside the impugned order dated
26.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.985 of 2025 in C.C.No.4612 of 2022.
2. The petition in Crl.M.P.No.985 of 2025 in C.C.No.4612 of
2022 was filed by the petitioner–Accused No.2 seeking issuance
of a ‘No Objection’ for renewal of his passport bearing
No.L54002541 for a period of ten (10) years in the normal
##PAGE2##2
course, in accordance with the Central Government Notification
dated 25.08.1993 vide G.S.R. 570(E).
3. The trial Court, after hearing the learned counsel for the
petitioner and upon perusal of the material available on record,
partly allowed the petition by issuing a ‘No Objection’ for
renewal of the passport, but restricted the period of renewal to
one (01) year only. Aggrieved thereby, the present revision
petition has been filed.
4. Heard Sri Enuganti Sudhanshu Rao, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial
Court erred in restricting the renewal of the passport to a period
of one year, instead of granting renewal for the regular period of
ten years, and that too without assigning any cogent reasons.
He further submitted that the trial Court imposed two
conditions, namely, the petitioner shall furnish the details of the
renewed passport to the Court immediately after renewal and
shall not leave the country without prior intimation to the
Court.
##PAGE3##3
6. In support of his contention, he relied upon the judgment
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Mahesh Kumar Agarwal v.
Union of India & Anr.1, wherein it was observed that:
“The respondents examined the application in the
light of Section 6(2)(f) of the Passports Act, the
notification G.S.R. 570(E) dated 25.08.1993 issued
under Section 22 of the Passports Act (hereinafter
‘GSR 570(E)’) and the OM dated 10.10.2019.
According to the respondents, the appellant could be
exempted from the bar under Section 6(2)(f) only if
the competent criminal court expressly permitted his
departure from India and specified, or at least
enabled, the period of travel, in terms of GSR 570(E).
Since the NIA Court, Ranchi, had granted ‘no
objection’ only for the limited purpose of renewal of
the passport, had directed re-deposit of the passport
immediately after renewal and had not granted
permission to travel abroad in the pending NIA case,
the respondents took the position that the statutory
bar under Section 6(2)(f) continued to operate and
that a regular ten-year passport could not be issued.”
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel
for the petitioner and upon perusal of the material available on
record, this Court is of the view that the trial Court erred in
1
SLP (Civil) No.17769 of 2025
##PAGE4##4
restricting the renewal of the passport to one year. In
accordance with the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court
(supra) and other precedents, Courts cannot restrict the period
of renewal of a passport even though criminal cases are pending
against the applicant. Therefore, the petitioner–Accused No.2 is
granted No-Objection for renewal of his passport bearing No.
L54002541 for a period of ten (10) years in the normal course,
in accordance with the Central Government Notification dated
25.08.1993 vide G.S.R. 570(E). All other conditions imposed by
the trial Court shall remain unaltered.
8. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed.
_______________
K. SUJANA, J
Date: 29.01.2026
SS
##PAGE5##5
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.102 of 2026
Date: 29.01.2026
SS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.