2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 4403
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Uppala Satish – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana through P.S.Nootankal – Respondent
CRLP 400/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.400 OF 2026
DATE :03.02.2026
Between :
Uppala Satish & another
… Petitioners/A.1 & A.2
And
The State of Telangana,
Through P.S.Nootankal,
Rep., by the Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State of Telangana,
Hyderabad
… Respondent/Complainant
: ORDER :
This criminal petition is filed under Section 480 &483 of
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) by
the petitioners/Accused seeking their enlargement on bail in
connection with Crime No.230 of 2025 of Noothankal Police
Station, Suryapet District.The offences alleged against the
petitioners are under Sections 103, 115(2), 118(1), 191(2) (3)
r/w.190 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for short ‘BNS’).
##PAGE2##- 2 -
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 10.12.2025 at
about 02:00 hours, the complainant Smt. Uppula Lingamma,
wife of Uppula Mallaiah, gave a complaint to the police stating
that on 09.12.2025 at about 11:00 hours during the night, her
husband Uppula Mallaiah, along with villagers Karingula
Mahesh, Karingula Shekar, and Uppula Pavan, was sitting near
the party symbol blocks (party dimmelu) in their village and
discussing. At that time, villagers namely Uppula Sathish,
Korvi Gangaiah, Veeraboina Sathish, Uppula Gangaiah, Uppula
Yalamanchi came to the spot and abused her husband in filthy
language, saying “Lanjakodakallara, meeru ikkada kurchuni
pracharam chesthunnara ? Pracharam chesthe mimmalni
champutham, lanjakodakallara.” Thereafter, the accused
pushed her husband on to the road and beat him. Accused
Uppula Sathish and Korvi Gangaiah attempted to kill him by
attacking him with a stone and a stick, hitting him on the head.
As a result, he fell on the road and sustained bleeding injuries
on his head. Meanwhile, villagers Korvi Naresh and Korvi
Ganesh and some others tried to rescue the complainant’s
husband from their clutches, but the accused also beat them
with sticks and hands. Hence, the complainant requested the
police to take necessary action against the accused basing on
##PAGE3##- 3 -
which, the police registered the case against the accused for the
above offences.
3. Heard Sri Angothu Nehru, learned counsel appearing for
the petitioners and Sri M. Vivekananda Reddy, learned
Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is
that petitioners are innocent of the said allegations and they are
no way connected with the alleged offences. The investigation is
almost completed. Petitioners are in jail from 10.12.2025. The
parents of the petitioners are old aged and they are dependents
on them. Petitioners would abide any conditions that may be
imposed by this Court and prayed this Court to grant bail to the
petitioners.
5. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor
opposed bail stating that the allegation against the petitioners is
serious in nature. A.1 beat with cot wood and A.2 beat with a
stone on the injured head as a result he died. When Lw.3, 4, 8
and 9 tried to rescue the deceased, all the accused beat them
also. Investigation is also still pending. The post mortem
examination report of the deceased and the medical certificates
##PAGE4##- 4 -
of the petitioners are yet to be received. The petitioners in this
case also suffered injuries in the said incident. Hence,
petitioners are not entitled for bail and prayed to dismiss this
petition.
6. Considering the submissions made and a perusal of
material on record, the allegations against the petitioners are
very serious in nature. In view of political rivalry the petitioners
along with other accused picked up quarrel with the deceased
and assaulted him with sticks and stones due to which he
received head injury and died. Considering the severity of
allegations against the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to
grant bail to the petitioners and the same is liable to be
dismissed.
7. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if