SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 4411

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Dappu Yellam – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangna – Respondent
WP 3164/2026



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

WRIT PETITION No.3164 of 2026

Date: 03.02.2026

Between:

Dappu Yellam and Anr.

..Petitioners

And

The State of Telangana, rep. by its

Principal Secretary,

Department of Panchayat Raj and

Rural Development,

Secretariat, Hyderabad

and seven others ..Respondents

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:-

“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in

the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of

the Respondent Nos.2 to 7 in not taking any action or

stopping the illegal construction actuates by respondent No.8

with the collusion of respondent No.5 and continued the

construction activity day in and day out admeasuring 60

Square Yards in the H.No.13/40/B Assessment TPIN

Sankarampet Revenue village and Mandal, Medak District, is

illegal, arbitrary, violation of Articles 14, 16 and 300A of the

Constitution of India besides in violation of Telangana State

Panchayath Raj Act and Rules made there under

consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 to 7 to demolish

the illegal unauthorized constructions raised by the

respondent No. 8 on the above stated property…”

##PAGE2##

EVV, J

Wp_3164_2026

2

2. Heard Sri P.Padma Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner;

Sri P.Ashok Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for

Panchayat Raj appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3; Sri K.Pradeep

Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.4

to 6 and Sri Sandeep Goud, learned Assistant Government Pleader

for Revenue appearing for respondent No.7 and with their consent,

this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission

stage.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner and respondent No.8 are sons of late Rajaiah. The father

of the petitioner has got his share i.e., old house to an extent of 60

square yards bearing H.No.1-3-40/B, Assessment TPIN

Sankarampet Revenue Village and Mandal, Medak District. After

the death of the petitioner’s father, disputes arose between the legal

heirs of late Rajaiah. Respondent No.8 has filed a suit for

permanent injunction against the petitioner and others vide

O.S.No.351 of 2025 and the said Court has granted ad interim

injunction in I.A.No.870 of 2025, dated 18.12.2025, restraining the

petitioner and others from interfering with the peaceful possession

and enjoyment of respondent No.8 herein over the subject property.

The petitioner has filed a petition to vacate the said injunction order

vide C.F.R.No.46 of 2026. During pendency of the said suit, taking

##PAGE3##

EVV, J

Wp_3164_2026

3

advantage of the injunction order, respondent No.8 has been

making attempts to change the nature of the house property by

raising construction. Therefore, the petitioner has made a detailed

representation, dated 19.01.2026 to the respondent authorities.

The grievance of the petitioner is that, even after receipt of the said

representation, respondent authorities did not take any action.

Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner prays this Court to

pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would

submit that the enquiry has already been initiated on the

representation made by the petitioner and appropriate action would

be taken during the course of time by following due process of law.

Stating so, learned Assistant Government Pleader also seeks to

pass appropriate orders.

5. In view of the above submissions and since the enquiry has

already been initiated on the complaint/representation made by

the petitioner and notices have also been issued to the concerned,

this Court, without making any observations on the merits and

demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ

petition directing respondent No.3 to complete the enquiry by duly

affording an opportunity of personal hearing to all the concerned

including respondent No.8 and pass appropriate orders strictly in

##PAGE4##

EVV, J

Wp_3164_2026

4

accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top