IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Dappu Yellam – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangna – Respondent
WP 3164/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION No.3164 of 2026
Date: 03.02.2026
Between:
Dappu Yellam and Anr.
..Petitioners
And
The State of Telangana, rep. by its
Principal Secretary,
Department of Panchayat Raj and
Rural Development,
Secretariat, Hyderabad
and seven others ..Respondents
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:-
“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in
the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of
the Respondent Nos.2 to 7 in not taking any action or
stopping the illegal construction actuates by respondent No.8
with the collusion of respondent No.5 and continued the
construction activity day in and day out admeasuring 60
Square Yards in the H.No.13/40/B Assessment TPIN
Sankarampet Revenue village and Mandal, Medak District, is
illegal, arbitrary, violation of Articles 14, 16 and 300A of the
Constitution of India besides in violation of Telangana State
Panchayath Raj Act and Rules made there under
consequently direct the respondent Nos.2 to 7 to demolish
the illegal unauthorized constructions raised by the
respondent No. 8 on the above stated property…”
##PAGE2##EVV, J
Wp_3164_2026
2
2. Heard Sri P.Padma Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner;
Sri P.Ashok Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for
Panchayat Raj appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3; Sri K.Pradeep
Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.4
to 6 and Sri Sandeep Goud, learned Assistant Government Pleader
for Revenue appearing for respondent No.7 and with their consent,
this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission
stage.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the
petitioner and respondent No.8 are sons of late Rajaiah. The father
of the petitioner has got his share i.e., old house to an extent of 60
square yards bearing H.No.1-3-40/B, Assessment TPIN
Sankarampet Revenue Village and Mandal, Medak District. After
the death of the petitioner’s father, disputes arose between the legal
heirs of late Rajaiah. Respondent No.8 has filed a suit for
permanent injunction against the petitioner and others vide
O.S.No.351 of 2025 and the said Court has granted ad interim
injunction in I.A.No.870 of 2025, dated 18.12.2025, restraining the
petitioner and others from interfering with the peaceful possession
and enjoyment of respondent No.8 herein over the subject property.
The petitioner has filed a petition to vacate the said injunction order
vide C.F.R.No.46 of 2026. During pendency of the said suit, taking
##PAGE3##EVV, J
Wp_3164_2026
3
advantage of the injunction order, respondent No.8 has been
making attempts to change the nature of the house property by
raising construction. Therefore, the petitioner has made a detailed
representation, dated 19.01.2026 to the respondent authorities.
The grievance of the petitioner is that, even after receipt of the said
representation, respondent authorities did not take any action.
Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner prays this Court to
pass appropriate orders.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would
submit that the enquiry has already been initiated on the
representation made by the petitioner and appropriate action would
be taken during the course of time by following due process of law.
Stating so, learned Assistant Government Pleader also seeks to
pass appropriate orders.
5. In view of the above submissions and since the enquiry has
already been initiated on the complaint/representation made by
the petitioner and notices have also been issued to the concerned,
this Court, without making any observations on the merits and
demerits of the case, deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ
petition directing respondent No.3 to complete the enquiry by duly
affording an opportunity of personal hearing to all the concerned
including respondent No.8 and pass appropriate orders strictly in
##PAGE4##EVV, J
Wp_3164_2026
4
accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.