IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Voleti Shiva Kameswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
K. Sekhar Reddy – Respondent
CRP 250/2026
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.250 OF 2026
DATE OF ORDER: 30.01.2026
Between:
Voleti Shiva Kameswara Rao.
Petitioner/defendant.
AND
K.Sekhar Reddy.
Respondent/plaintiff.
ORAL ORDER
Heard Mr.D.Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner.
2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 24.10.2025 in
I.A.No.281 of 2023 (Old I.A.No.173 of 2020) in O.S.No.24 of
2023 (Old O.S.No.1204 of 2016) passed by the learned Principal
District and Sessions Judge, Medchal – Malkajgiri District at
Kushaiguda.
##PAGE2##2
3. Respondent/plaintiff has filed the aforesaid suit in
O.S.No.24 of 2023 (new) against the petitioner/defendant for
recovery of money basing on the pronote dated 11.11.2013.
During the pendency of the said suit, petitioner herein has filed an
application under Order XVI Rule 7 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 vide I.A.No.281 of 2023 with a request to
summon the Medical Officer, Mandal Primary Health Center,
Bhattiprolu, Guntur District, along with the Attendance Register
pertaining to the year November, 2013 contending that the
petitioner being a Government Doctor, on the alleged date i.e.,
11.11.2013, he is discharging his duties at Mandal Primary
Health Center, Bhattiprolu. Therefore, the question of execution
of promissory note in favour of the respondent/plaintiff at Uppal,
Hyderabad, does not arise. Respondent/plaintiff has created the
said document. Petitioner obtained the attendance certificate and
marked the same as Ex.B.2 on his behalf. Respondent/plaintiff is
disputing Ex.B.2 duty certificate and opposing the contention of
the petitioner that the pronote was created by him. Therefore, he
##PAGE3##3
seeks to summon the Medical Officer, Mandal Primary Health
Center, Bhattiprolu, Guntur District, to depose with regard to the
aforesaid facts.
4. Respondent/plaintiff has not filed counter opposing the said
petition. However, vide the impugned order dated 24.10.2025,
learned trial Court dismissed the said application observing that
the said suit was filed in the year 2016, written statement was
filed on 16.06.2017 and PWs.1 to 3 were cross-examined
voluminously. DW.1 completed his evidence long back in the
year 2020 itself. The matter was posted for further evidence on
the defendant side. Petitioner/defendant has already filed Ex.B.2
duty certificate. Therefore, there is no need to summon the
Medical Officer as sought by the petitioner herein.
5. It is the specific contention of the petitioner herein that he
has not executed the said pronote dated 11.11.2013 in favour of
the respondent/plaintiff. In the written statement, he has
specifically contended that one Vellaturi Jithendra and Vellaturi
##PAGE4##4
Hemanth are brothers and close relatives to the petitioner.
Petitioner’s wife died due to ill-health. At the time of her
treatment in need of money, petitioner borrowed an amount of
Rs.60,000/- from the said Jithendra. Thus, he is disputing the
execution of the said pronote in favour of the respondent/plaintiff.
He has specifically pleaded that the said facts in the written
statement. However, he has already obtained Ex.B.2 duty
certificate, dated 19.11.2018 issued by the Medical Officer,
Bhattiprolu, Guntur District.
6. It is the specific contention of the respondent that Ex.B.2
duty certificate is created by the petitioner and petitioner seeks to
summon the Medical Officer only to prove the said document.
However, the said Medical Officer will help the petitioner by
deposing false, as he is his colleague.
7. Perusal of record would reveal that respondent filed the
aforesaid suit in the year 2016. Upon formation of the new
districts, it was transferred to the learned trial Court and
##PAGE5##5
renumbered as O.S.No.24 of 2023 (new). The evidence of PW.3
was completed in the year 2019. Even then, he filed the present
application in the year 2020 and the same was re-numbered as
I.A.No.281 of 2023.
8. Perusal of record inclu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.