HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND HON’BLE JUSTICE M.G. PRIYADARSINI Mr. P.Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Nizampur Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. D.Prakash Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. K.K.Mahender Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 5.

JUDGMENT: (Per Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya The Appeal arises out of an order dated 30.10.2023 passed by the IX Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar in I.A.No.162 of 2024 in O.S.No.414 of

2023.

2. By the impugned order, the Trial Court allowed the interlocutory application filed by the respondent Nos.1- 5/defendant Nos.2-6 (I.A.No.162 of 2024) for rejection of plaint in the Suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff (O.S.No.414 of 2023).

3. The Trial Court was of the view that the plaint was liable to be rejected on the ground that the plaint lacked pleadings as to the maintainability of the relief for directing the defendant Nos.2-6 (the respondent Nos.1-5 in the first Appeal) to execute a registered Sale Deed in favour of the plaintiff. The Trial Court was also of the view that there was no pleading for justifying specific performance of Agreement