SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 76586

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Kailash Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 583/2025



THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.583 of 2025

O R D E R

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.3 and 4 to quash the proceedings against them in S.C.No.41 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Cyberabad at LB Nagar. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Section 370(A)(2) of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (for short ‘the Act’).

02. Heard Sri Meekala Durgaiah, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

03. In brief, the case of the prosecution is that the Police, received credible information about running of brothel house and raided the premises at Flat No.102, Road No.3, Vasavi Nilayam Apartment, Pavangiri Colony, Hayathnagar, and found that accused Nos.1 and 2 were organizing brothel house and petitioners-accused Nos.3 and 4 are the customers of the said brothel house.

04. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that the woman who was found with petitioners-accused Nos.3 and 4, is not a trafficked woman and petitioners are nothing to do with the alleged offences. The ingredients of the offence under Section 370(A)(2) of IPC and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Act does not attract to the present case on hand. Thereby, he prayed to quash the criminal proceedings against the petitioners-accused Nos.3 and 4.

05. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submitted that there are specific allegations against the petitioners and the truth or otherwise would come out only after conducting full-fledged trial by the concerned Court below and prayed to dismiss this Criminal Petition.

06. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is relevant to extract the provision under Section 370 of IPC:

“370. Trafficking of a Person: (1)Whoever, for the purpose of exploitation, (a) recruits, (b) transports, (c) harbours, (d) transfers, or (e) receives, a person or persons, by-

Firstly— using threats, or Secondly— using force, or any other form of coercion, or Thirdly— by abduction, or Fourthly— by practising fraud, or deception, or Fifthly— by abuse of power, or Sixthly— by inducement, including the giving or receiving of payments or benefits, in order to achieve the consent of any person having control over the person recruited, transported, harboured, transferred or received, commits the offence of trafficking.

Explanation 1— The expression "exploitation" shall include any act of physical exploitation or any form of sexual exploitation, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude, or the forced removal of organs.

Explanation 2— The consent of the victim is immaterial in determination of the offence of trafficking.

(2)Whoever commits the offence of trafficking shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years, but which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.

(3)Where the offence involves the trafficking of more than one person, it shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.

(4)Where the offence involves the trafficking of a minor, it shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years, but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.

(5)Where the offence involves the trafficking of more than one minor, it shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than fourteen years, but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.

(6)If a person is convicted of the offence of trafficking of minor on more than one occasion, then such person shall be punished with imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of that pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top