THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.3133 OF 2025

ORDER:

The writ petition is filed seeking following relief:

“… to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.4 and 5 in interfering into the peaceful cultivation of the Petitioner’s agricultural land to an extent of Ac.1-25 Gts in Survey No.129/73 which is situated at Yadagiripally Village, Miryalguda Mandal, Nalgonda District and conducting the Panchanama on the Assign land of the Petitioner without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law and without having jurisdiction prepared the panchanama and threatening the Petitioner to handover the land of the Petitioner to the Respondent No.6 is highly, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and consequently to set aside the impugned panchanama dated 19.02.2024 conducted by the Respondent No.5 which was conducted without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law on the Petitioner’s land to an extent of Ac.1-25 Gts in Survey No.129/73 which is situated at Yadagiripally Village, Miryalguda Mandal, Nalgonda District and pass…”

2. It is stated that petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Acs.1-25 guntas in Survey No.129/73 situated at Yadagiripally Village, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District. It is stated that initially subject land was assigned to the grandfather of the petitioner under the landless poor category as per the provisions of G.O.Ms.No.1406 dated 25.07.1958. After the death of his grandfather, petitioner succeeded to the subject land and requested the respondent authorities to mutate his name in revenue records and issue pattadar passbook in his favour. As respondent Nos.2 and 4 were not mutating the name of the petitioner in revenue records and issuing pattadar passbook, he filed W.P. No.28565 of 2024 before this Court and this Court, by the order 16.10.2024 disposed of the writ petition, directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 therein to consider the application of the petitioner for mutation and issuance of e-pattadar passbook in respect of the subject land, within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of that order, and the same is pending before respondent Nos.2 to 4 for adjudication. It is further stated that respondent No.6 with an intention to grab the land of the petitioner, in collusion with respondent Nos.4 and 5 got conducted panchanama on 19.02.2024 on the subject land, without issuing any notice to the petitioner, stating that the grandfather of the petitioner has sold land to an extent of Ac.0-34 guntas out of subject land to respondent No.6. Despite the subject land being the Assigned land respondent No.6 is trying to mutate his name in the revenue records. As the Police were also interfering in the disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.6, petitioner filed W.P. No.24867 of

2024 before this Court, and this Court by the order dated 15.10.2024 has directed Police authorities not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.6. It is stated that on the strength of fake panchanama dated 19.02.2024, respondent No.6 has instituted a suit in O.S. No.18 of 2025 before the learned Junior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda, (for short ‘Trial Court’) seeking bare injunction.

Hence, this writ petition.

3. It is settled law that when the land has been assigned by following the procedure contemplated under Laoni Rules,1950 and the Policy enunciated by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.1406 dated 25.07.1958, the revenue authorities are having power to initiate action for violation of the conditions thereof, by resuming the land into the custody of the Government.

4. As it is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that at the instance of respondent No.6, respondent Nos.