SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 76834

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Shyamala Naveen Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 999/2024



THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.999 of 2024

O R D E R

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused No.6 to quash the proceedings against him in P.R.C.No.20 of 2023 on the file of the learned XIII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at Rajendranagar, Rangareddy District. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 370, 370(A) of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (for short ‘the Act’).

02. Heard Sri P. Animi Reddy, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

03. In brief, the case of the prosecution is that the Police, received credible information about running of brothel house and raided the premises of Watman room in the Ground floor and Room No.202 in the second floor at Plot No.3, Jagan Apartments, Sree Laxmi Nagar Colony, Manikonda and found that the accused Nos.2 to 5 were organizing brothel house and petitioner-accused No.6 is the customer of the said brothel house.

04. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the woman who was found with petitioner-accused No.6, is not a trafficked woman and the petitioner is nothing to do with the alleged offences. The ingredients of the offence under Sections 370, 370(A) of IPC and 3, 4 and 5 of the Act does not attract to the present case on hand. Thereby, he prayed to quash the criminal proceedings against the petitioner.

05. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submitted that there are specific allegations against the petitioner and the truth or otherwise would come out only after conducting full-fledged trial by the concerned Court below and prayed to dismiss this Criminal Petition.

06. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is relevant to extract the provision under Section 370 of IPC:

“370. Trafficking of a Person: (1)Whoever, for the purpose of exploitation, (a) recruits, (b) transports, (c) harbours, (d) transfers, or (e) receives, a person or persons, by-

Firstly— using threats, or Secondly— using force, or any other form of coercion, or Thirdly— by abduction, or Fourthly— by practising fraud, or deception, or Fifthly— by abuse of power, or Sixthly— by inducement, including the giving or receiving of payments or benefits, in order to achieve the consent of any person having control over the person recruited, transported, harboured, transferred or received, commits the offence of trafficking.

Explanation 1— The expression "exploitation" shall include any act of physical exploitation or any form of sexual exploitation, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude, or the forced removal of organs.

Explanation 2— The consent of the victim is immaterial in determination of the offence of trafficking.

(2)Whoever commits the offence of trafficking shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years, but which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.

(3)Where the offence involves the trafficking of more than one person, it shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.

(4)Where the offence involves the trafficking of a minor, it shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years, but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.

(5)Where the offence involves the trafficking of more than one minor, it shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than fourteen years, but which may extend to imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine.

(6)If a person is convicted of the offence of trafficking of minor on more than one occasion, then such person shall be punished with imprisonment for life, which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top