SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 76891

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
B SAIDAIAH NALGONDA DIST. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TS. P.RAJ HYDERABAD AND 4 OTRS. – Respondent


THE HON’ BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.25998 of 2017

ORDER:

The case of the petitioner, as per the writ affidavit, is that petitioner was initially appointed as “Carrobar” (Bill Collector) on 20.08.1988 on a fixed monthly honorarium of Rs.40, following a Resolution passed by the Grama Panchayat due to the urgent requirementfor manpower to collect house tax and engage in village development work. His remuneration was subsequently revised periodically, with the current salary standing at Rs.2000 per month. The Government Pradesh issued G.O.Ms.No.212, dated April 22, 1994, stipulating that all daily wage or consolidated pay workers who were in service as on 25.11.1993, and who had completed five continuous years of service by that date, were to have their services regularized. By this criterion, the petitioner claims full eligibility, having already served more than five years by the cutoff date. It is further stated that his eligibility was formally recognized and recommended by administrative officials, specifically, the Extension Officer (Panchayat Raj), Miryalaguda, forwarded a proposal for his regularization via Letter No.45/94 dated 02.11.1994. This proposal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top