SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 4870

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
A. Anjaiah – Appellant
Versus
Padmavathamma – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA APPEAL SUIT No.166 of 2019 THE 10th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 Between:

A. Anjaiah and another …Appellants/plaintiffs AND Smt. Padmavathamma and 12 others …Respondents/defendants

JUDGMENT:

Heard Sri K. Ramachandra, learned counsel for the appellants/plaintiffs, Sri Chaitanya K, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4, 7 to 12 and learned Government Pleader for appeals appearing for respondent Nos.5 and 6.

Perused the record.

2. The Appeal Suit is preferred by the appellants/plaintiffs aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned Principal District Judge at Mahabubnagar (for short ‘the Trial Court’), in O.S.No.76 of 2014 dated 29.10.2018, wherein, said suit filed for declaration of suit land as belonging to Mahadeva Swamy temple, declaration of registered sale deed dated 19.03.2013 executed by respondent Nos.1 to 3/defendant Nos.1 to 3 in favour of respondent No.4/defendant No.4 as null and void and for perpetual injunction to restrain the respondents/defendants from interfering with the suit land and for correction of entries in the revenue records, has been dismissed.

3. For the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top