IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2083 of 2025

10^th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 Between:

Bushra Fatima Khatoon.

…Petitioner AND Shaik Mohamed Taher Quadri.

...Respondent

ORDER:

Heard Ms. Puruhuta Lodha, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri Md. Liaqatullah Khan, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the entire record.

2. The Civil Revision Petition is filed by the revision petitioner/respondent-mother aggrieved by the order dated 04.04.2025 in I.A.No.929 of 2024 in G.W.O.P.No.506 of 2020 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court-cum-XIII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, (‘Family Court’), wherein a petition filed under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (‘Act’) read with Section 151 of CPC filed by the respondent herein-father seeking interim custody of the minor son was allowed in part granting interim custody of minor child Shaik Mohammed Aahil Taher Quadri born on 06.12.2019 to the respondent from 04:00 pm on every Monday to 04:00 pm on every Friday and to the revision petitioner from 04:00 pm on every Friday to 04:00 pm on every Monday and permitting the non-custodian parent to have virtual visitation once in a day for 20 minutes, as per convenience of the parents and the minor child pending disposal of the G.W.O.P.

3. The background facts of the case are that the revision petitioner and the respondent were married on 08.02.2019 and the minor son was born on 06.12.2019. Thereafter, the revision petitioner and the respondent had disputes resulting in filing of the G.W.O.P. seeking custody of the minor child by the respondent herein. At the time of filing the G.W.O.P, an application vide I.A.No.439 of 2020 under Section 12 of the Act was filed seeking temporary custody of the minor by the respondent-father. Upon contest, said petition was allowed granting interim temporary custody to the respondent starting from Sunday and Saturday between 10:00 am to 05:00 pm. Subsequently, on 31.03.2022 an application was filed by the respondent for grant of interim custody from Wednesday 03:00 pm to Monday 03:00 pm every week and the child shall be in the custody of the revision petitioner from Monday 03:00 pm to Wednesday 03:00 pm every week upto 31.05.2022. In an application filed seeking modification of said arrangement, the learned Family Court orally directed that the existing arrangement shall continue from 01.06.2022 onwards. Both the parties followed the arrangement and the same continued for about 29 months. During said period, the respondent found that the minor was not taken care of when he is in the custody of the revision petitioner-mother, when there was a tooth problem and when the child suffered burn injuries on his chest and was suffering from rickets problem. The revision petitioner herein could not provide proper medical treatment. Besides, it is also noticed that the revision petitioner was using medicines which are meant for aborting the fetus within 8 weeks. The said pills are likely to cause damage to hormones which produce milk and the revision petitioner was not breastfeeding their minor son.

4. Further, according to the respondent, the revision petitioner, while living at matrimonial home, has stolen Rs.40,000/- which was kept under the pillow and the same was recorded in the CCTV. On 03.07.2020, the revision petitioner left the matrimonial home along with their son and valuables. In that context, the G.W.O.P. was filed and interim order was passed. The second arrangement which was made i.e., the interim custody of the child from Wednesday 03:00 pm to Monday 03:00 pm by the respondent and from Monday to Wednesday by the revision petitioner, the said arrangement was made during Ramzan from 31.03.2022 upto

31.05.2022. On the oral direction, the said arrangement continued till 21.10.2024. During this entire time period, the minor child was admitted to school and the respondent pa