SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 5090

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
B.Chenna Krishna Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD Between:

B.Chenna Krishna Reddy ...Petitioner AND The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Kongarakalan, Thukkuguda, Ranga Reddy District and two others.

...Respondents Mr.A.Venkateshwarlu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

ORDER:

1. The present Civil Revision Petition arises out of an order 13.11.2025 passed by the learned XV Additional District and Sessions Judge at Ibrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy District (‘Trial Court’) dismissing I.A.No.195 of 2025 in O.S.SR.No.418 of 2025 filed by the petitioner under Order XXXIII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’), seeking exemption of Court fee of Rs.1,44,526/- in the Suit.

2. The petitioner is the plaintiff, who filed the suit for recovery of amount of Rs.1,42,08,236/-. The impugned order records that the petitioner failed to establish the conditions under Order XXXIII Rule 1 of the CPC for institution of the Suit as an indigent person. The Trial Court also came to the specific finding on the material placed before it that the petitioner is financially well-established and owns substantial immovable properties and is also running educational institutions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top