IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.793 of 2025 DATE: 17.02.2026 BETWEEN:

Munna Kumar @ Munna Sonar …..Petitioner/Accused And The State of Telangana, Through PS. Special Team-1, CCS, DD Hyderabad Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, At Hyderabad. …..Respondent : ORDER :

This Criminal Revision case is filed by the petitioner/Accused aggrieved by the order dated 08.09.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2390 of 2025 in LPC.No.21 of 2020 by the XII Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hyderabad.

2. The petitioner herein filed the said petition under Section petition was dismissed by the trial Court observing that because of the petitioner, though the C.C is of the year 2014, the same was pending before the trial Court and that the petitioner belongs to Bihar State. In view of the absence of accused persons the matter was listed as LPC, the sureties of accused were forfeited and NBW was issued on 11.06.2019 and recall petition was filed in 2025 and no cogent reasons were explained by the petitioner. Hence, observing the same, the trial Court dismissed the said petition.

3. Heard Sri B.Muralidhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri M.Ramachandra Reddy learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent – State.

4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is ready to cooperate with the trial Court and he is not aware of the proceedings. Further petitioner is suffering from mental health issues and Nervous system disorders and taking treatment at his native place. As such, petitioner has not appeared before the trial Court and there is no willful or deliberate negligence on the part of petitioner in attending the 5. On the other hand learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the same stating that because of the petitioner, the case is pending from 2014 and the same was converted into LPC, as the police are unable to trace out the petitioner herein. If the NBW is recalled, it would be difficult for the police to secure the presence of petitioner and prayed to dismiss this petition.

6. Considering the submissions made by the parties and the material on record, this criminal revision case is disposed of directing the petitioner to appear before the trial Court and file recall petition and it is for the trial Court to dispose of the same on merits in accordance with law.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand closed.

_______________

K. SUJANA, J Date : 17.02.2026

Rds