IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

13^th February, 2026 CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3945 OF 2024 Between:

Dodla Neeraja …Petitioner AND M/s. Sri Ram Raghavendra Chits (P) Ltd., and others …Respondents

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed to set-aside the orders in E.P.No.943 of 2024 in A.A.F.C.No./Dispute No.197 of 2020 dated 02.09.2024 on the file of IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. Heard Sri Gaddamanugu Rajashekar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G. Subash, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.1/decree holder filed E.P.No.943 of 2024 under Order 21 Rule 48 of CPC on the file of the IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, City Court, Hyderabad for attachment of salary to recover Rs.10,74,225/- and the trial Court passed an interim order for attachment of salary of JDR. No.2 i.e., Rs.53,000/- per month to recover the amount. The entire chit amount is being recovered from the Petitioner/JDR No.2.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the respondent/JDR No.1 has paid an amount of Rs.4,60,000/-. The trial Court passed an ex-parte order, and the petitioner came to know only recently after the 1^st Respondent/Decree Holder served the warrant for attachment of salary of the petitioner/JDR No.2

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the gross salary of the petitioner is Rs.1,62,890/-, out of which the salary deduction is Rs.90,737/-, being more than 55% of the gross salary. The Respondent No.1/DHR has thrown the entire amount on the Petitioner/JDR No.2 without dividing the amount between other judgment debtors, including the principle borrower, by misusing jointly and severally liable versions.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that already they have paid Rs.9,54,000/- out of Rs.10,74,225/- as on today and the balance amount payable is Rs. 1,20,225/-. Due to financial difficulties, the petitioner seeks to pay the remaining amount in monthly installments of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent organization.

7. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.1/DHR has not disputed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is inclined to direct the petitioner to pay Rs.10,000/- per month to the respondent No.1-Organization, without fail, till recovery of the balance amount.

8. With the above said direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Petition, shall stand closed.

_____________________________________ NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, J Date: 13.02.2026 NIT

4773 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3945 OF 2024 Date: 13.02.2026 NIT