FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.214 OF 2016 Dated: 12.02.2026 XXXXX … Petitioner/2^nd Respondent Vs.

1.XXXXX … Respondent/Petitioner

2. To whom so ever it may concern … Respondent/Respondent

JUDGMENT

(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice K.LAKSHMAN)

Heard Sri Sundaresan, learned counsel representing Sri

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 15.07.2016, in G.O.P.No.16 of 2011, passed by the learned Family Court – cum – VI Additional District Judge, Khammam, appellant preferred the present appeal.

3. Respondent No.1 has filed a petition under Section 7 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, vide G.O.P.No.16 of 2011 against the appellant to appoint her as guardian of the ward by name, Kum.Vangala Sai Sowmya. Vide order dated 15.07.2016, learned Family Court has allowed the said petition appointing her as guardian for the person and property of the minor girl. Challenging the said order, appellant preferred the present appeal.

4. Both learned counsel appearing for the appellant and respondent No.1 brought to the notice of this Court that the girl was born on

16.07.1998 and she became major.

5. In the light of the same, nothing remains in the present appeal to adjudicate further and the cause in the present appeal has become infructuous. Therefore, Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.214 OF 2016