IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

12^th February, 2026 Between:

Swargam Ramulu and another.

…Petitioners AND The State of Telangana and 3 Others.

…Respondents

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed with the following relief:

“…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent police in taking action against the 4th respondent for extending severe threats to do away with the lives of the petitioners, if they do not transfer the house on her name, and to provide protection to the petitioners pursuant to the complaint dt. 5.10.2019, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust, and to grant......”

2. Heard Mr.N.Hari Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.D.Pradeep, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, as the respondent police authorities failed to take action against the unofficial the present petition has been filed seeking appropriate directions.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that making a General Diary entry. Upon due inquiry and proceedings, a petty case was registered vide No.1081 of 2019 on 05.11.2019, and consequential proceedings have been initiated. Therefore, the contention of the petitioners that the respondent police failed to act on their representation is unfounded, accordingly prays for dismissal of the petition.

5. I have perused the material available on record.

6. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent police authorities are not providing protection pursuant to their complaint. However, the explanation offered by the respondent police indicates that, upon receipt of the representation, proceedings were initiated by registering a petty case. In view of the same, the contention regarding inaction on the part of the police is without substance. As the grievance has evidently been addressed by the respondent police authorities, it is evident that nothing remains in this petition for adjudication. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedies available under law, this petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

__________________ N.TUKARAMJI, J

4831