SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 5711

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
Swapna Dillari – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
WP 16342/2019



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.16342 OF 2019 DATE: 11.02.2026 Between :

Swapna Dillari.

… Petitioner AND Union of India Rep., by its Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, South Block, New Delhi and four others.

… Respondents.

O R D E R:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

“…To issue an appropriate Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No 1, 2 and 3 in not taking any action against respondent Nos.4 and 5 in removing petitioners name and Surname from the prone websites is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Principle of natural justice……..”

2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that upon registration of Crime No. 680 of 2019 against the unofficial respondents, the matter was duly investigated in accordance with law and a charge sheet was filed before the competent Court. Consequently, C.C. No. 3006 of 2021 was taken on file by the learned II Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy. It is further submitted that during the pendency of the Calendar Case proceedings, the parties amicably settled their disputes before the Lok Adalat. In view of such settlement, the offences were compounded by the Court concerned in accordance with law, and the Calendar Case proceedings were accordingly closed. Hence, it is contended that nothing further survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. 4. I have perused the material placed on record.

5. Having regard to the relief sought by the petitioner and the subsequent developments reported by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, particularly the amicable settlement before the Lok Adalat and the compounding of offences resulting in closure of the Calendar Case it is evident that the cause of action no longer subsists, as such, no further adjudication is warranted in the present proceedings.

6. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________ N.TUKARAMJI, J Date: 11.02.2026

MRKR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top