IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos.65 and 118 of 2015 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10.02.2026 Between: xxxxxxxx Appellant AND xxxxxxxx Respondent This Court made the following:

COMMON JUDGMENT (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K. Lakshman)

Heard Mr. Kiran Reddy Mallarapu, learned counsel for the appellant-husband and Mr. Vijay Ashrit, learned counsel for the respondent-wife in F.C.A.No.65 of 2015.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order and decree dated 04.08.2014 in F.C.O.P. No.40 of 2011 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Karimnagar, the appellant-husband preferred an appeal in F.C.A.No.65 of 2015. Appellant-

husband has filed petition vide F.C.O.P.No.40 of 2011 under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking restitution of conjugal rights and the same was dismissed vide order dated

04.08.2014.

3. Likewise, feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order and decree dated 04.08.2014 in F.C.O.P. No.77 of 2010 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, at Karimnagar, the respondent- wife preferred an appeal in F.C.A.No.118 of 2015. Respondent-wife has filed a petition vide F.C.O.P.No.77 of 2010 under Section 12(c) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking to declare the marriage dated 23.10.2010 as null and void on the ground that the said marriage was performed by way of abduction. The same was allowed vide order dated 04.08.2014.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent-wife, on instructions, submits that both the parties have amicably settled their disputes during the pendency of the present appeal.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant in F.C.A.No.118 of 2015 would submit that appellant has taken no objection from him from long back.

6. Learned counsel for the appellant in F.C.A.No.65 of 2015 got elevated as judge of Andhra Pradesh High Court.

7. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, nothing remains in the present appeals to adjudicate further, cause in the present appeals does not survive. These appeals are liable to be dismissed and accordingly, the same are dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the parties to take steps to restore the present appeals, if cause survives.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_________________ K. LAKSHMAN, J ___________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J

10^th February, 2026.

LPD

254 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos.65 and 118 of 2015

10^th February, 2026.

LPD