SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 5833

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
Ranga Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 3814/2026



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.3814 of 2026 DATE OF ORDER: 09.02.2026 Between:

Ranga Reddy, S/o. Thimma Reddy ...Petitioner / Decree Holder AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Irrigation & CAD Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad & 4 others ...Respondents

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondents in not depositing compensation amount to the petitioner as per the judgment & decree in L.A.O.P.No.53 of 2016, dated 31.08.2021 and E.P.No.44 of 2025 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Narayanpet. A consequential prayer is sought to direct respondent Nos.1 to 5 to deposit entire decreetal amount as per the judgment and decree in L.A.O.P.No.53 of 2016, dated 31.08.2021 and E.P.No.44 of 2025 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Narayanpet.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar circumstances, this Court in W.P.No.12837 of 2023 dated 28.04.2023 passed the following order:

“Having regard to the same, the writ petition is disposed of and respondent No.5 is directed to deposit the decretal amount in terms of order and decree, dated 30.03.2011, passed in O.P.No.65 of 2009 by the Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal, to the credit of E.P.No.5 of 2023 in O.P.No.65 of 2009 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further prays this Court to pass similar orders as passed in W.P.No.12837 of 2023, dated

28.04.2023.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Irrigation appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for respondent Nos.3 to 5 did not dispute to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleaders appearing for the respondents.

6. Recording the submissions of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondents, and in terms of order passed by this Court in W.P.No.12837 of 2023, dated 28.04.2023, the respondent authorities are directed to deposit the compensation amount in terms of the judgment and decree, passed in L.A.O.P.No.53 of 2016, dated 31.08.2021 and E.P.No.44 of 2025 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Narayanpet, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of four (04)

months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending in this petition, shall stand closed.

_________________________________ JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Date: 09.02.2026 Nsk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top