SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 5982

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
N. Narayan Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 3621/2026



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.3621 of 2026 DATE OF ORDER: 06.02.2026 Between:

Sri. N Narayan Reddy.

…Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Chief Secretary, Central Secretariat, Khairtabad and eight others.

…Respondents

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for GAD appearing for respondent No.1, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for respondent No.2, Sri.V.Narasimha Goud, learned standing counsel for HMDA appearing for respondent No.3, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.4 and 5, Sri.P.Krishna Reddy, learned standing counsel for Municipality appearing for respondent No.6, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent No.7, Sri. Sameer Ahmed, learned standing counsel for HYDRAA appearing for respondent No.8 and Sri.G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned standing counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent No.9. With their consent, the writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This writ petition has being filed seeking the following prayer:-

“to declare the inaction, failure and neglect of the Respondent authorities in not considering and acting upon the Petitioners statutory representation dated 01.12.2025, relating to the dangerous dilapidated and hazardous connection of the PJR Colony-Gangaram Road connecting to National Highway-65, including illegal encroachments on footpaths and road margins and the unsafe and unscientific access at the Gangaram junction, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently directing the Respondents to consider and dispose of the said representation by passing a reasoned order within a time frame to be fixed by this Honourable Court and to take appropriate remedial action in accordance with law and applicable statutory norms to ensure road safety pedestrian safety and protection of public health.”

3. Brief facts as stated in this writ petition are that the petitioner is a senior citizen residing at H.No.19-183/2, PJR Colony, Madhavapuri Hills., Ameenpur, Sangareddy District, Telangana. It is submitted that the PJR Colony-Gangaram NH-65 access road is a vital public road used by large number of commuters including school going children, women, senior citizens, office-goers, pedestrians and vehicles moving towards Hyderabad City, Chandanagar, Ramachandrapuram, ORR, Gachibowli and Sangaredddy. It is further submitted that due to prolonged neglect and absence of proper resurfacing, the entire stretch of the said road is severely damaged, un-engineered and is in hazardous condition, filled with deep potholes, craters, broken and uneven surfaces, loose gravel, construction debris and continuous dust, making it extremely unsafe for motorist and pedestrians alike. The case of the petitioner is that rampant illegal encroachments by private individuals and commercial establishments on footpaths, road margins and portions of the carriageway have drastically reduced the effective road width, forcing pedestrians to walk on the carriageway and exposing them to constant danger and due to broken road surface, loose debris encroachments and slow moving of traffic there is continuous air and dust pollution, causing respiratory ailments, eye irritation and other serious health issues. Hence, the petitioner on 01.12.2025, made a representation and requested the respondent authorities to take immediate action against the illegal footpath encroachments, narrowing of the carriageway and severe air and dust pollutions, however, the same is still pending for consideration. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed.

4. Learned standing counsel for Municipality appearing for respondent No.6 would submits that if the petitioner’s representation dated 01.12.2025, is still pending for consideration, the respondent autho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top