SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 6035

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Ramavath Huni – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 13981/2020



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

WRIT PETITION No.13981 of 2020

Dated: 05.02.2026

Between:

Ramavath Huni … Petitioner

And

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by its Principal Secretary,

Home Department, Secretariat,

Hyderabad and eight (8) others

… Respondents

ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of

Constitution of India for the following relief/s:-

‘‘… to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one

in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action

of the respondent No.5 in interfering into the civil disputes

and threatening the petitioner to hand over the land of the

petitioner to an extent of Ac.2.09 gts in Sy.No.213/2-2

situated at Mulkacherla Revenue Village Sivar,

Adavidevulapalli Mandal, Nalgonda District to the

respondent No.6 to 9 and also threatening the petitioner

that not to enter into the land of the petitioner by

colluding them is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional

and violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in

violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 and 300-A of

constitution of India and consequently direct the

respondent No.5 not to interfere into the civil disputes and

not to threaten the petitioner to hand over the land of the

petitioner to an extent of Ac.2.09 gts in Sy.No.213/2-2

situated at Mulkacherla Revenue Village Sivar,

Adavidevulapalli Mandal, Nalgonda District and pass such

other order or orders …”

##PAGE2##

2

2. Heard Mr.Dinesh Reddy, learned counsel representing

Mr.Rapolu Bhasker, learned counsel for the petitioner and

Mr.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for

Home representing learned Government Pleader for Home

appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5. Perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned

counsel for the petitioner seeks a direction to respondent

No.5, not to interfere with the inter se civil disputes between

the petitioner and unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 9 and to

pass appropriate orders.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home

submits that Crime No.56 of 2020 registered against

unofficial respondent Nos.6 to 9 for the offences punishable

under Sections.447, 324, 504 r/w Section 34 of I.P.C. is

under investigation and that respondent No.5 is not

interfering with the inter se private disputes between the

parties. Stating so, he seeks to pass appropriate orders.

5. Recording the submissions of learned Assistant

Government Pleader for Home, this Writ Petition is disposed

of directing respondent No.5 not to interfere with the inter se

private disputes between the petitioner and unofficial

##PAGE3##

3

respondent Nos.6 to 8, without following the procedure

prescribed under law. No costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand

closed.

____________________________

JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

05.02.2026

ESP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top