IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.215 of 2017 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17.02.2026 Between: xxxxxxx Appellant.

AND xxxxxxx Respondent.

This Court made the following:

JUDGMENT

(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Lakshman)

Heard Mr.L.Anand, learned counsel representing Mr.P.Nagender Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent.

2. We have perused the record.

3. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/wife challenging the order dated 15.02.2017 in F.C.O.P.No.1906 of 2013 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Rangareddy District at L.B.Nagar.

4. Appellant is the wife and respondent is the husband. Their marriage was performed on 22.10.2009. The said marriage was consummated and out of the wedlock, they were blessed with two sons. Thereafter, respondent/husband has filed the aforesaid petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against the appellant/wife seeking restitution of conjugal rights contending that the appellant implicated him in criminal case for the offences punishable under Sections 49