SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 6485

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Shaik Amjad – Appellant
Versus
Shri Mohammed Abdul Rahman – Respondent


IN THE COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.929 of 2025 THE 25th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 Between:

Shaik Amjad …Petitioner and Shri Mohammed Abdul Rahman …Respondent

ORDER:

Heard Sri R.A. Achuthanand, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Syed Iliyas, learned counsel for the respondent.

Perused the record.

2. The Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner herein/respondent/defendant aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Narayanpet (for short ‘the Trial Court’) in I.A.No.372 of 2024 in O.S.No.8 of 2022, dated 11.03.2025, wherein, a petition filed by the respondent herein/petitioner/plaintiff under Order XV Rule 5 of CPC seeking striking off defence of the petitioner herein for failure to deposit arrears and monthly rent has been allowed i.e. the petitioner's written statement and evidence were ordered to be struck off.

Facts of the case:

3. The respondent filed suit for eviction, recovery of arrears of rent and damages against the petitioner herein. Respondent claimed to be the absolute owner of suit schedule property and having entered into a rental agreement dated 17.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top