SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 6501

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
B.Sudhakar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The State Government of Telangana – Respondent
WP 5761/2026



IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.5761 of 2026 DATE OF ORDER: 24.02.2026 Between:

B.Sudhakar Reddy ...Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad & 5 Others ...Respondents

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed questioning the action of respondents in disconnecting water and sewerage connection to the premises bearing No.3-4-125 to 3-4-127, Lingampally, Barkatpura, Hyderabad – 29 (hereinafter referred as “subject property”), without issuing any notice, demanding payment of water / sewerage bill and levying arrears of Rs.4,90,916/- i.e. arrears beyond 3 years prior to issuance of the notice. A consequential prayer is sought to direct the respondents for re- connection of water and sewerage connection in respect of the subject property and further to issue proper bill with all the details and payable arrears of charges, as per law, to enable the petitioner to pay the dues if any.

2. Though various grounds are raised in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner confined her submissions to the extent of disposal of petitioner’s representation dated

05.02.2026 pending before respondent No.2.

3. Mr. A.Veeresh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3 and learned counsel representing Mr. G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, who takes notice on behalf of respondent Nos.4 and 5, would submit that to the extent of disposing of the pending petitioner’s representation dated 05.02.2026 before respondent No.2, appropriate orders may be passed.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.2 to 5.

5. Recording the submissions of learned counsel appearing for petitioner and respondents, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 05.02.2026 and after giving a fair opportunity of hearing, shall pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law within a period of two (02)

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications if any pending in this petition, shall stand closed.

_________________________________ JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Date: 24.02.2026 NOTE:

Issue CC by today B/o Nsks

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top