SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 6718

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Sri Md. Imran – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No. 34293 OF 2025

24.02.2026 Between: Md. Imran ….. Petitioner And Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Department of Financial Services)

& others ….. Respondents

O R D E R:

The case of petitioner is that he maintains two bank accounts ie. SBI A/c No. 20227120719 and HDFC A/c No. 50100578007241 containing lawful savings of approximately Rs. 62,00,000/-, and both accounts were frozen on police instructions in connection with Crime No. 208 of 2025 of Panjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad, without identification of any specific transaction or quantification of any amount allegedly linked to the offence. It is stated, though petitioner’s name appears in the mentioned crime, no material has been disclosed to demonstrate that the amounts lying in both the accounts constitute proceeds of crime or are directly connected to the alleged activity, and no nexus has been established between the alleged offence and the funds in the said accounts.

1.1. According to petitioner, the allegations in the FIR are vague and based on suspicion and freezing of the entire accoun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top