IN THE COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1135 of 2025

17^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 Between:

Ratnavath Dharmender …Petitioner/respondent No.1/plaintiff and Ratnavath Gopal and 4 others …Respondents/petitioner/defendant Nos.1 to5

ORDER:

Heard Sri Kiran Palakurthi, learned counsel for the petitioner/respondent No.1/plaintiff and Sri K. Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4/petitioner, respondent Nos.3, 4/defendant Nos.1, 3 and 4. Perused the record.

2. The Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Principal District Judge at Khammam (for short ‘the Trial Court’), in I.A.No.10 of 2025 in O.S.No.86 of 2018 dated 12.03.2025, wherein, said I.A filed by respondent No.1 herein under Order IX Rule 7 r/w 151 of CPC seeking to set aside the forfeiture order dated 17.04.2019 and to take his written statement on record, was allowed.

3. Respondent No.1 filed I.A.No.10 of 2025 stating that the petitioner herein filed suit for partition and separate possession and said matter stood posted for arguments. At that time, it was noticed that the written statement which was