SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 6964

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
M. Pranithi – Appellant
Versus
Veljala @ M. Venkata Narsamma – Respondent


IN THE COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2560 of 2024

16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 Between:

M. Pranithi …Petitioner/respondent/plaintiff and Veljala @ M. Venkata Narsamma died per LRs. and 4 others …Respondents/petitioners/defendants

ORDER:

Heard Sri J. Rama Mohana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K. Chaithanya, learned counsel for respondent No.2. Perused the record.

2. The Civil Revision Petition is preferred by the revision petitioner/respondent/plaintiff aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar (for short ‘the Trial Court’) in I.A.No.286 of 2024 in O.S.No.160 of 2016 dated 05.08.2024, wherein, the said petition filed under Section 33 of Indian Stamp Act to refer the original Agreement document dated 26.12.2013 (Oppandapatram executed by Ramachandraiah) and original Notarized partition document (Bhagaparishkara patram) dated 07.11.2014 (executed among Manemma and Venkata Narsamma) for calculating stamp duty and penalty, has been allowed.

3. The revision petitioner/plaintiff filed the main suit vide O.S.No.160 of 2016 seeking declaration of title, re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top