SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 6967

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Bolleddu Neha – Appellant
Versus
Bolleddu Sushaanth Preetham – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.98 of 2025

16th DAY OF MARCH, 2026 Between:

Bolleddu Neha.

…Petitioner AND Bolleddu Sushaanth Preetham.

...Respondent

ORDER:

Heard K. Venkatesh Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Subba Rao Vadrevu, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the entire record.

2. The Civil Revision Petition is filed by the revision petitioner/respondent aggrieved by the order dated 29.06.2024 in I.A.No.11 of 2024 in D.O.P.No.55 of 2021 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-IV Additional District Judge at Khammam, (‘Family Court’), wherein a petition filed to receive the documents consisting of digital documents which were earlier not received while disposing of I.A.Nos.8 to 10 of 2023, were permitted to be received subject to proof and relevance and admissibility.

3. The respondent herein filed a divorce petition seeking dissolution of marriage with the revision petitioner. In said D.O.P., the respondent filed I.A.Nos.8 to 10 of 2023 to receive certain documents. While allowing said interlocutory application, some of the documents were not marked on the ground

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top