SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 7213

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, J
S. Pitcheswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Government of Telangana – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No.20951 of 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: B. Krishna
For the Respondents: Government Pleader for Home

In disciplinary matters involving professional negligence, when administrative authorities exhibit failure to provide adequate support or resources for duty performance, the court may intervene to reduce the severity of the disciplinary punishment, ensuring it remains proportionate to the employee's specific culpability.

Headnote:(A) Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3(1) and (2) - Escort duty negligence - Convict escape - Proportionality of punishment - Petitioner challenged order of reduction of time scale of pay by three stages for three years - Court found lapses on both sides regarding security protocols and timing - Disciplinary punishment modified to reduction of time scale of pay by one stage for one year. (Paras 3, 17, 20, 21)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a police constable, was assigned to escort two convicted prisoners to a hospital. Due to various administrative lapses, including short notice and inadequate security protocols, the prisoners escaped. A disciplinary inquiry concluded the petitioner was guilty of dereliction of duty, resulting in a reduction of his time scale of pay for three years.

Findings of Court:
The court observed that while the petitioner committed lapses, the authorities also failed in their duties, such as providing inadequate escort staff and failing to provide weapons. The court held that the petitioner could not be made a scapegoat for the entire administrative failure.

Issues: Whether the disciplinary punishment imposed for the escape of prisoners was disproportionate in light of administrative lapses and lack of adequate security resources provided to the escort personnel.

Ratio Decidendi: Where there is evidence of systemic or administrative failure in providing necessary resources for designated duties, punishing the subordinate to the maximum extent is disproportionate. The court has the authority to balance the culpability and modify the punishment to meet the ends of justice.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of with the punishment modified.

Table of Content
1. summary of facts leading to the writ petition regarding disciplinary action. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments presented by the respondents regarding the conduct of inquiry and established negligence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. petitioner's defense and contention regarding the lack of evidence and administrative failures. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. court's analysis of mutual failures and shared responsibility in the incident. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. modification of disciplinary punishment based on judicial discretion. (Para 21 , 22)

ORDER:

The present Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner to quash the Order passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.7520 of 2013, dated 14.09.2016, and to release all consequential benefits.

2. Heard Sri B. Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.

3. Brief facts of the case are as follows:

(a) Petitioner filed O.A.No. 7520 of 2013 before the A.P. Administrative Tribunal challenging the order of the 2nd respondent wherein punishment of RTSP by 3 stages for 3 years with effect is awarded and the period of suspension from 04.05.2007 to 15.10.2008 is treated as ‘Not on duty’ vide proceedings in D.O.No.4049, No.L&O/B7/346/2007, dated 2-6/7-2013 as illegal.

(b) The petitioner was initially appointed as a Police Constable and subsequently promoted as Head Constable and posted at CAR (Central Armed Reserve) Hyderabad. In the year 2007, while he was working on deputation at Cherlapalli Jail, he was assigned the duty of escorting the convicted prisoners. On 27.04.2007, the petitioner was entrusted the duty to escort two convicted prisoners namely Afzal (No.7697) and Syed Arshad Baqtiquar (No.7701) along with another PC-9065 Sri E.Paul to Osmania General Hospital for treatment. The two prisoners were taken to Neurology Department to consult the doctor concerned, but the doctor was not available at his room No.213, they proceeded to Room No.214 where they were directed to go over to Osmania General Hospital old building Room No.219. Again, the junior doctor stationed there, directed them to go to "Quli Qutub Shahi" block Room No.404. There also, they did not find any doctor to get treatment for the prisoners and therefore, the fact was informed to the Head Constable Manaiah and further informed that they were coming to the vehicle. This information is given to Sri Manaiah by a cell phone.

(c) Before going to the vehicle, the petitioner asked E. Paul, PC-9065 to get Tiffin and offered Rs.50/-, but the PC rejected to bring Tiffin. While they were coming down to the vehicle, Syed Fazal, one of the convict prisoners, pushed the petitioner down and escaped from his custody. Though he tried to chase the prisoner, he could not succeed. In view of the said incident, the petitioner was placed under suspension by disciplinary authority vide D.O.No.1027/No.L&O/87/346/2007, dated 01.05.2007. Subsequently, a preliminary enquiry was conducted by the Assistant Commissioner of Police, III CAR Head Quarters, Hyderabad, and submitted his report dated 23.4.2007. After receiving the said report of the ACP, it was decided by the competent authority to conduct a regular enquiry and therefore, a charge memo was issued vide No. L&O/B9/PR/73/07 No.L&O/B9/346/2006, dated 31.8.2007 which reads as under:

Article of Charge:

S/Sri S.Pitcheswar Rao, HC 1144 & E.Paul, PC 9065 of (G) Coy, CAR Head Quarters, Hyderabad, were on deputation to jail department and while they were performing Escort Duty at Osmania General Hospotial on 27-04-2007, the two CT Prisoners 1) Syed Afzal No.7697 2) Syed Arshad Baqtiqar, No.7701 of Charlapalli Jail escaped from their custody from Osmania General Hospital. The prisoners escaped from the custody due to gross negligence and dereliction of duty.

S/Sri S.Pitcheswar Rao, HC 1144 & E.Paul, PC 9065 of (G) Coy, CAR Head Quarters, Hyderabad, by their above mentioned act, has exhibited lack of dev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top